<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>@yawen &#187; sweden</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yawenchen.com/blog/tag/sweden/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yawenchen.com/blog</link>
	<description>the city and its stories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 16:11:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Old Viking Language</title>
		<link>http://yawenchen.com/blog/2008/05/05/the-swedish-language/</link>
		<comments>http://yawenchen.com/blog/2008/05/05/the-swedish-language/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 02:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yawen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[French]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[languages]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pronunciation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swedish]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yawenchen.com/blog/?p=22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At first glance at Swedish signs, billboards and advertisements, I immediately noticed the similarities to English, especially letter exchanges such as &#8216;k&#8217; for &#8216;c&#8217;, &#8216;v&#8217; for &#8216;w&#8217; and &#8216;y&#8217; for &#8216;i&#8217;. Sometimes there are double &#8216;t&#8217;s or &#8216;p&#8217;s instead of one. Nevertheless, I was fairly convinced that I could navigate the city without having to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At first glance at Swedish signs, billboards and advertisements, I immediately noticed the similarities to English, especially letter exchanges such as &#8216;k&#8217; for &#8216;c&#8217;, &#8216;v&#8217; for &#8216;w&#8217; and &#8216;y&#8217; for &#8216;i&#8217;. Sometimes there are double &#8216;t&#8217;s or &#8216;p&#8217;s instead of one. Nevertheless, I was fairly convinced that I could navigate the city without having to stop and consult as frequently as I did in Japan (I was a lost cause there). I could figure out what most shop signs stood for, which is impressive for being in a foreign country for the first time. I&#8217;ll stop myself short there because the ability to read does not equate to or translate to speech. I&#8217;ll have to start myself from the beginning. Mostly, I avoided speaking because there were certain sounds I could not muster &#8211; oh, the fated rolling &#8216;r&#8217;.<span id="more-22"></span></p>
<p>I found an excellent Swedish language tutorial/study guide over at the Stockholm School of Economics (See <a href="http://www2.hhs.se/isa/swedish/default.htm">Introduction to Swedish</a>), which contains phrases, pronunciations, word lists, and other resources. Skimming through the word various vocabulary, I was surprised to see how many were French derivatives, or at least were <em>comparable</em> to French ( FYI: I studied French for 4 academic years). Sometimes I can&#8217;t really tell when English/French/Swedish were like this: May/Mai/Maj. What I did find interesting is its relation to Old English &#8211; language that survived the Viking Ages? Modern English/Old English/Swedish: Bloody/Blodig/Blodig.</p>
<p>As for pronunciation, I don&#8217;t believe my language training in English, Mandarin-Chinese or French provide too much help; it may only provide a pronunciation reference.  Swedish has a distinctive pitch and rhythm. English and Mandarin seem relatively flat, comparably. Furthermore, I believe the sounds are formed mainly at the tip of the tongue, contrasting the Swedish formation. French have some letters that are similar-sounding (French/Swedish:  eu/ö) but the rhythm is dissimilar. While French words actually have accents applied (i.e. accent grave/acute) as &#8216;hints&#8217;, Swedish have strange spellings like &#8217;sj&#8217;, &#8217;stj&#8217;, &#8216;kj&#8217; on top of &#8216;j&#8217; &#8216;k&#8217;, &#8216;z&#8217; that have re-worked sounds, so you&#8217;re really left with, &#8220;How do you <em>say</em> that?&#8221;</p>
<p>Next up, I&#8217;ll let you know about my progress with the rolling &#8216;r&#8217;s. Right now my throat is sore and I sound like a tiger or a shrieking little animal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yawenchen.com/blog/2008/05/05/the-swedish-language/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gendered Symbols/Signs</title>
		<link>http://yawenchen.com/blog/2008/05/01/gendered-symbols/</link>
		<comments>http://yawenchen.com/blog/2008/05/01/gendered-symbols/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 21:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yawen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taiwan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yawenchen.com/blog/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The other day I saw an article plastered on a Metro paper (Sweden) about the introduction of a female symbol on crosswalk signs. I couldn&#8217;t find the proposed image anywhere on the internet, but it&#8217;s more or less a silhouette of a feminine figure with curves/hips, wispy hair and a dress.
While I understand the &#8220;gender-consciousness&#8221;, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other day I saw an article plastered on a <a href="http://www.metro.lu">Metro</a> paper (Sweden) about the introduction of a female symbol on crosswalk signs. I couldn&#8217;t find the proposed image anywhere on the internet, but it&#8217;s more or less a silhouette of a feminine figure with curves/hips, wispy hair and a dress.<span id="more-14"></span></p>
<p>While I understand the &#8220;gender-consciousness&#8221;, I feel it&#8217;s excessive to insert gendered symbols on what I consider gender-neutral territory: the crosswalk sign. The sign could, hypothetically, be modeled after the male figure. Even so, I believe it has become a present-day universal symbol that is not meant to be gendered; it is not a mark of female or male identity, but more of a <em>people</em> identity. That aside, I do appreciate a re-design of these symbolic signs &#8211; just not necessarily in a gendered way. For example, Taiwan introduced <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wvIncC52MU&amp;NR=1">an animated crosswalk</a> sign. (See the AP story, &#8220;<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24388446">Sweden plans to introduce female crosswalk signs</a>&#8220;)</p>
<p>So I wonder then, could these symbols ever be unlabeled, or are we always categorizing? Could representative human graphics ever be gender-less or race-less? Ask my old boss who decided my pixel people graphics were too &#8220;white&#8221;, and that I should make them &#8220;colored&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yawenchen.com/blog/2008/05/01/gendered-symbols/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You Better Be Traveling Light</title>
		<link>http://yawenchen.com/blog/2008/05/01/you-better-be-traveling-light/</link>
		<comments>http://yawenchen.com/blog/2008/05/01/you-better-be-traveling-light/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 19:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yawen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[american airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[continental airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[delta airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jetblue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Priceline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[smartertravel.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southwest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united airlines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgin America]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yawenchen.com/blog/?p=13</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Summer travelers, beware! Suspiciously, fees are being applied at around the same time &#8211; during this month of May. ( See: &#8220;You&#8217;re charging me for what?!&#8221; by Kate Hamman &#8211; SmarterTravel.com)
I remember feeling appalled last year when I made the move to New York from California after learning that Virgin America charges extra ($10) for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Summer travelers, beware! Suspiciously, fees are being applied at around the same time &#8211; during this month of May. ( See: <a href="http://www.smartertravel.com/travel-advice/you-re-charging-me-for-what-airline-fees-way-up-since-january.html?id=2555947">&#8220;You&#8217;re charging me for what?!&#8221;</a> by Kate Hamman &#8211; SmarterTravel.com)</p></blockquote>
<p>I remember feeling appalled last year when I made the move to New York from California after learning that <a href="http://virginamerica.com">Virgin America</a> charges extra ($10) for a second baggage. Weren&#8217;t travelers always allowed two complementary baggage spaces? For someone who is moving across the country, being limited to one is considerably restrictive. Thinking back, I could have shelled out extra (after all, it was <em>only </em>$10) and saved my new roommate and me a lot of sweat and pain lugging that 60-pound piece up 4 flights of stairs &#8211; if only I knew the trend, the <em>standard</em>, now: extra fees for that second bag. According to <a href="http://www.smartertravel.com/blogs/today-in-travel/american-final-legacy-carrier-to-bag-fee.html?id=2557349">SmarterTravel.com</a>, major airlines including <strong>United</strong>, <strong>American</strong>, <strong>Continental</strong> and <strong>Delta</strong> are charging up to $25. <strong>Virgin America</strong> is also hiking it up to $25. At least <strong>JetBlue</strong>&#8217;s fees are only $20?<span id="more-13"></span></p>
<p>Personally, I figure as long as the air fares are not dramatically increased, second-baggage fees are no big deal. Yet, we find out that airlines are not making profit due to sky-high fuel prices, except <strong>Southwest</strong>. We can certainly expect fuel surcharges <a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24357885/">like Delta&#8217;s</a>. A month ago, I was weeping over high fares for New York/California flights. Now I feel that I should be content that I nabbed a round-trip for <strong>$339</strong> via <a href="http://priceline.com">Priceline</a> on American (for late June-July). But, compare that to my round-trip to <strong>Sweden</strong> for merely <strong>$514</strong> in mid-February. I might as well give myself another vacation abroad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yawenchen.com/blog/2008/05/01/you-better-be-traveling-light/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
