<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>@yawen &#187; gender</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yawenchen.com/blog/tag/gender/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yawenchen.com/blog</link>
	<description>the city and its stories</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 16:11:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Gendered Symbols/Signs</title>
		<link>http://yawenchen.com/blog/2008/05/01/gendered-symbols/</link>
		<comments>http://yawenchen.com/blog/2008/05/01/gendered-symbols/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 21:14:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>yawen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taiwan]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yawenchen.com/blog/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The other day I saw an article plastered on a Metro paper (Sweden) about the introduction of a female symbol on crosswalk signs. I couldn&#8217;t find the proposed image anywhere on the internet, but it&#8217;s more or less a silhouette of a feminine figure with curves/hips, wispy hair and a dress.
While I understand the &#8220;gender-consciousness&#8221;, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other day I saw an article plastered on a <a href="http://www.metro.lu">Metro</a> paper (Sweden) about the introduction of a female symbol on crosswalk signs. I couldn&#8217;t find the proposed image anywhere on the internet, but it&#8217;s more or less a silhouette of a feminine figure with curves/hips, wispy hair and a dress.<span id="more-14"></span></p>
<p>While I understand the &#8220;gender-consciousness&#8221;, I feel it&#8217;s excessive to insert gendered symbols on what I consider gender-neutral territory: the crosswalk sign. The sign could, hypothetically, be modeled after the male figure. Even so, I believe it has become a present-day universal symbol that is not meant to be gendered; it is not a mark of female or male identity, but more of a <em>people</em> identity. That aside, I do appreciate a re-design of these symbolic signs &#8211; just not necessarily in a gendered way. For example, Taiwan introduced <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wvIncC52MU&amp;NR=1">an animated crosswalk</a> sign. (See the AP story, &#8220;<a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/24388446">Sweden plans to introduce female crosswalk signs</a>&#8220;)</p>
<p>So I wonder then, could these symbols ever be unlabeled, or are we always categorizing? Could representative human graphics ever be gender-less or race-less? Ask my old boss who decided my pixel people graphics were too &#8220;white&#8221;, and that I should make them &#8220;colored&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://yawenchen.com/blog/2008/05/01/gendered-symbols/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
