Virtual communications

Not communicating in person is absolutely okay. Right? So many alternatives exist that not having to face someone is no big deal. With online social networks, it’s easy. Too easy.

For me, it started out in the journaling world, back when the word “weblogs” were more common than the shortened “blogs”. The social nature of online confessional writing intrigued me. I was able to connect with strangers as we shared stories and secrets, which provided a strong sense of identity. I detailed my day, my feelings, my thoughts. I also connected with others’ writings & profiles and joined special-interest groups.

It’s not that different today, but I’m no longer a great content producer. No more lengthy journal formats. I’ve become more of a micro-blogger, a Facebook-status or Twitter 140-character writer. Other social aspects I crave are neatly packaged in Facebook — the maintenance of online identity, the browsing of others’ profiles, the messaging. And yet that’s not enough. Add Livejournal, CouchSurfing, LinkedIn and that’s at least 5 active social networking accounts I maintain. Top that off with the more direct channel: AIM/G-chat, e-mail, call/text, and that’s at least 8 ways to communicate.

At some point, I’ve realized I’ve become overloaded. Sure it’s easy to reach someone, but how meaningful is that one Facebook wall post as opposed to a phone call? Welcome to Communication 2.0.